Diberdayakan oleh Blogger.

Popular Posts Today

Can you crack code to get this job?

Written By Unknown on Kamis, 03 Oktober 2013 | 21.51

Can you solve this riddle? Picture: BigCommerce Source: Supplied

The 'batphone' will ring once the code is cracked. Source: Supplied

EVER fancied yourself the next Mark Zuckerberg or David Karp?

Well, here's your chance to shine.

Sydney-based tech company Bigcommerce is recruiting engineers to work in their inner-city warehouse offices, fitted out with ping pong tables, Xboxes and nerf guns in true start-up vibe.

The only thing standing in your way is solving the ridiculously difficult riddle pictured above.

Once cracked, the code will generate a phone number that leads to a "batphone" in their Sydney offices.

The only problem is it's so tough, no one has managed to crack it yet.

Bigcommerce's vice president of Engineering Soren Harner said they were still waiting on a call to the office 'batphone', although it's definitely possible as it has been solved by staff in the office.

"We're looking for people who are constantly learning and hungry to improve their skills and find better ways to do things."

"The core values around working as a team, being smart and getting stuff done, keeping things simple. People identity with those values," Mr Harner said, adding that the company chose its unusual approach to recruitment to gain staff who were talented about problem solving.

"Traditional recruitment is hit and miss in that regard, you have to rely on your gut," he said.

"We want engineers who are enthusiastic and passionate and crack puzzles for fun. It also creates an element of scarcity. We are recruiting a lot of people but compared to the number of people who would like to work in a tech start up there is a scarcity."

Since rebranding in 2009, the company - which provides software for nearly 40,000 online businesses - has received $75 million in venture capital funding, including $40 million from the co-founder of AOL who also sits on the board.

Successful applicants will join about 65 others in the Sydney offices, as well as another 270 employees in the US.

Can you crack the code? Continue the conversation on Twitter @NewscomauHQ | @Bigcommerce | @victoria-craw

###


21.51 | 0 komentar | Read More

Simpson to coach Eagles

Hawthorn's senior assistant Adam Simpson set to be appointed West Coast coach. Source: News Limited

ADAM Simpson has won the race to become coach of West Coast, with the club overlooking dual premiership star Peter Sumich.

Simpson, 37, will be unveiled as the Eagles' sixth coach at a press conference at club headquarters on Friday morning.

Sumich, 45, had been regarded as the favourite to take over from John Worsfold and his latest snub comes as a devastating blow to the long-time assistant coach.

Sumich served under Worsfold for a decade at the Eagles before moving to Fremantle to work under Ross Lyon two years ago.

Simpson, the Hawthorn assistant coach and dual premiership player with North Melbourne, said he was looking forward to coaching in his own right.

"I am grateful for this opportunity and I look forward to moving across to Perth with my family and settling in to the challenge ahead,'' Simpson said.

"I have always admired West Coast from afar and I believe the list has an exciting mix of senior and emerging young players.


"I would like to acknowledge both Hawthorn and North Melbourne for the grounding they have given to me in this game.

"Hawthorn has been fantastic for me in the last four years and it was certainly a great experience to be a part of the coaching group as the club achieved the ultimate success last Saturday.

"Being so closely involved from a coaching perspective has provided me with a sense of the hard work which has to be done to achieve a premiership. I obviously enjoyed that feeling as a player, but it is different as a coach.

"I will move across to Perth as soon as possible and I look forward to meeting the players and working with them from the start of pre-season."

West Coast chairman Alan Cransberg thanked the other candidates who had been interviewed for the role, including Sumich, Leigh Tudor and current assistant Scott Burns.

"I am sure they will continue to add enormous value in assistant roles or any future senior coaching roles," Cransberg said.

"It was a tough job for the selection panel and the board to arrive at this unanimous decision, but we believe Adam is best equipped to take the club forward."

Simpson was a member of the Kangaroos' 1996 and '99 premiership sides, and also captained North Melbourne.

It came down to a race for two on Monday when both Sumich and Simpson presented to the club's board.

They were both called in to a second interview on Tuesday and psyche testing on Wednesday before Simpson was ratified by the Eagles' board on Thursday.

Simpson, who made his senior debut against West Coast at Princes Park in round 18, 1995, played 306 games for North Melbourne before retiring midway through the 2009 season.

He spent five years as club captain, was a premiership player in 1996 and 1999, won the club's fairest and best award in 2002 and was an All-Australian player in the same year.

ADAM SIMPSON
Born: February 16, 1976

PLAYING
Club: North Melbourne
Drafted: No.14 in 1993 national draft from Eltham/Northern U18
Career span: 1995-2009
Games: 306 (equal third highest in North Melbourne's history behind Brent Harvey 362 and Glenn Archer 311 and equal with Wayne Schimmelbusch)
Honours: premiership sides 1996 and '99; best and fairest 2002 (four other top-three placings); All-Australian 2002; club captain 2004-08

COACHING
Hawthorn assistant coach 2010-13
 


21.51 | 0 komentar | Read More

Sumich 'gutted' but Freo going places

West Coast legend and former club assistant Peter Sumich, who was overlooked for the Eagles coaching job and will remain at Fremantle as an assistant. Picture: Theo Fakos Source: PerthNow

PETER Sumich says he was 'gutted' to miss out on the West Coast coaching job and said there was still a 'burning desire to be a senior coach.

Sumich said he had re-signed as an assistant coach at Fremantle in the wake of the Eagles announcing that Adam Simpson would be the new Eagles coach.

Speaking with talkback radio 6PR this evening, Sumich said: "I'm gutted, make no doubt about that, and I'm disappointed I didn't get the job.

"I thought I was a really good chance again with this one and unfortunately it didn't work out, it got down to the last two, same as Essendon, and just missed out."

Analysis: Sumich a bridesmaid once again

Sumich said he had given it his best shot and had no regrets.

"I suppose the board, they were thinking a little bit differently to a lot of people and they make those decisions," he said.

"I just worry about when boards make decisions, there is usually not too many footy people on them, but that's fine."

However, he recognised that the club may have been looking for a new start with someone from outside the club.

"And that's fair enough, I love the club, I always will because I played in two premierships there and I was an assistant coach with the premiership, so they've been good to me," he said.

"But I've got to move on quickly because I know that Fremantle are going places."

Sumich said there was still a 'burning ambition' to coach and he would continue to apply for senior coaching roles at other clubs.

"But if it doesn't happen, I'm at a great club now and hopefully I can be there long-term but if it doesn't work out for me to be a senior coach, I'm not going to cry over it."

Sumich said that West Coast's discipline would have been an area of attention if he had won the top job, after being asked what he had learned in two years under Ross Lyon.

"I've got no doubt that some of the players, in my opinion, whether it's right or wrong, just need to be brought in line a little bit,' he said.

"I read a tweet by Ash Smith...he tweeted he was sick of seeing purple, go the Hawks.

"I just thought to myself, geez Ash, those little discipline things...you just need to bring back into line. The players shouldn't get out of line with tweeting those types of things."


21.51 | 0 komentar | Read More

Baby death likely a tragic accident

POLICE will investigate if a baby was left inside a car for an entire day before his devastated father found him lifeless

Ladybugs Childcare Centre in Helena Vallley, where a baby was found dead yesterday. Picture: Justin Benson-Cooper Source: PerthNow

POLICE will investigate whether a baby boy was left inside the family car for an entire day before his devastated father found him lifeless in the backseat.

Detectives are still piecing together the circumstances around the 11-month-old boy's tragic death after he was discovered in the car outside a daycare centre in Helena Valley, east of Perth.

It's understood the father may have gone to work on Wednesday morning and parked his vehicle for the day - unaware his son was in the backseat.

Fatal distraction: The tragedy of babies left in cars

When he went to collect the boy from Ladybugs Early Learning Centre at about 4pm that afternoon, he was told the child was never dropped off in the morning.


That's when he returned to his vehicle and found the baby unresponsive in the backseat.

Daycare centre staff performed CPR on the boy but their desperate attempts to revive him were unsuccessful. 

A dark grey Honda Civic sedan at the centre of the investigation into the death of an 11-month-old boy. Picture: Theo Fakos. Source: PerthNow

Police are not treating the death as suspicious but will continue interviews with the parents this afternoon and review results of a post-mortem examination.

It's understood the boy was the couple's only child.

"Major crime squad detectives are continuing their investigation into the sudden death of the child," a police spokesman said.

"At this time the child's death is not being treated as a homicide, however inquiries into the circumstances leading up to the child's death are continuing."

The temperature in Perth yesterday reached 25.7C - the hottest day in several weeks.

Staff members at the daycare centre have been offered counseling following the tragedy.

General manager Kim Beange praised the workers for their efforts in trying to save the boy's life and assured parents that no children witnessed the incident.

"Our staff's professionalism came to the fore and they remained vigilant throughout this time, and at no point were other children in attendance aware of the circumstances occurring," Ms Beange said.

"The child was enrolled at our facility in Helena Valley, however was not in attendance yesterday. When the staff were alerted to the fact that child needed first aid assistance they immediately commenced CPR and attempts to revive the child were unsuccessful.

"Our thoughts and condolences are with the parents of the child and their family through this tragic time."

Earlier, a police spokesman said: "It is a tragic time for their family and it's also hard for the daycare centre staff, who were also present."

This morning, parents at the centre said they were devastated to learn of the boy's death.

"I'm still a bit shocked; it's a bit emotional because it's a baby. I don't know who it is, it's a very sad story," one mother said.


View Larger Map


21.51 | 0 komentar | Read More

Buddy deal a year in the making

Written By Unknown on Selasa, 01 Oktober 2013 | 21.51

Lance Franklin is set to line up in a Sydney jumper next year. Digitally altered image. Source: HeraldSun

LANCE Franklin's plans to move to Sydney began soon after the 2012 Grand Final loss to the Swans.

Franklin's manager Liam Pickering contacted the Swans and said Franklin would like to play for them in 2014.

Talks were held during this season, before they were ramped up in the past eight weeks, culminating with today's stunning development — and nine-year deal worth $10 million.

Swans chief executive Andrew Ireland confirmed to the Herald Sun Franklin contacted Sydney and not vice versa.

"We got a general sense around the end of last season he would like to play for us,'' Ireland said.

"The difficulty was the Kurt Tippett thing was going through and we did that, and then nothing much happened.

"During the Liam indicated he was still keen to play for us if that was achievable and I guess probably over the past six to eight weeks, we had more conversations about it.''

Asked who contacted who, Ireland said: "Liam was the one who first indicated to us."

He admitted the club was stunned with the approach.

"It's not very often a player of his stature actually wants to approach you on the basis he wants to play for your club,'' Ireland said.

"Clearly, through the discussions along the say he loves the Hawthorn football club and the fishbowl of Melbourne has taken it s toll, and he wanted to get out of that.''

All Ireland's discussions with Franklin and his management will be investigated by the AFL for any potential rule breaches.

A statement from the league yesterday said it's Legal, Integrity and Compliance Department would interview key people.

The Swans coup has left Greater Western Sydney reeling, and the AFL blindsided.

Late last week they tabled an offer of $1.2 million over six years, well short of the Swans offer.

Ireland said Franklin's salary fitted into the cap, alongside the estimated $900,000 a year salary for Tippett.

"I don't want to go into the method of (payment) other than to say it's something that works with our salary cap,'' Ireland said.

He agreed it was a risk. "Once before I was involved in this sort of deal with Alastair Lynch (To Brisbane from Fitzroy) and he played 11 years after being recruited as a 26-year-old.''

Asked if the money was unconditional, Ireland said: "The contract is the contract.''

Despite the development, Ireland said the club was aware the Hawks had the ability to match the offer.

"The one thing we were respectful of, with free agency, is clearly Hawthorn have got an opportunity to match the offer, and so, we're not presumptuous to think Buddy is playing for us yet,'' Ireland said.

The official paperwork will be lodged on Friday.

Ireland hit out at critics of club's allowance.

"The reason why we were able to secure Kurt last year and hopefully secure Franklin this year, is because we've got enough space in the cap and the space in the cap comes about because players who were on our list will not be on our list, so therefore there is space,'' Ireland said.

"The reality is every player on our list shares in the cost of living allowance, it's in their contracts, the AFL know that, the AFL sees that, so there's no pool of cost of living for us to be able to hand it to players individually.

"People who spread that are not really honest about how it's used.''

How can the Swans afford Buddy?

Anderson questions salary cap bonus

Fans react to Buddy move


Footy's biggest trade bombshells

Buddy deal small change on world stage

HAVE YOUR SAY IN THE CHAT WINDOW BELOW

The news comes after News Limited today revealed that the Sydney Swans had launched a last-minute offer to snare Franklin, with the offer believed to be in the vicinity of $7 million across five seasons.

The Giants sensationally tweeted today that they had taken their offer to Franklin, believed to be worth $2 million a season, off the table. 

AFL writer Jon Ralph doubts whether Sydney needs cost-of-living allowance for players and warns of repercussions as Buddy Franklin makes his move.

Giants coach Leon Cameron said GWS still had several experienced players on its radar, despite being knocked back by key targets Franklin and Essendon ruckman Tom Bellchambers, who signed a two-year extension at Windy Hill.

"You're not going to lie about it (and it is a blow) but we've gone on the record this year that we're looking for mature-age players to come into our football club to help our young list ... and Lance was one of five or six that we've been looking at throughout the year," Cameron said.

"We're confident in where we're heading, we're confident in our list management strategy.

"To fast track our performance we need some players to join our football club and we're very confident we'll do that in the next couple of weeks."

Join Mark Robinson and Gerard Whately for a special edition of AFL360 tonight. Source: FoxSports

Five time premiership player, and GWS forwards coach Dermott Brereton reacts to news Lance Franklin has gone to rivals, Sydney Swans.

Former Kangaroos star and Fox Sports commentator David King says the Swans have scored an amazing coup in signing Hawthorn superstar Lance Franklin.

Clarko takes Mike to task

Latest trade news, whispers and more

GWS coach Leon Cameron chats to AFL 360 about Lance Franklin coming to the club.


21.51 | 0 komentar | Read More

Kicked out of school for being gay

Adam and his partner Rick. Picture: Supplied Source: NewsComAu

THESE are the letters that will sicken any fair-minded Australian to their core.

Gay Australians have opened up about the discrimination they faced from teachers, staff and peers at school in a series of heartfelt letters.

Today we publish two of these letters.

The letters were originally shared with Independent NSW State MP Alex Greenwich. They are honest, raw, heartfelt and shockingly revealing of the entrenched discrimination and homophobia which still exists in many schools.

Mr Greenwich is lobbying for the NSW State Government to change its Anti Discrimination Act so private and independent schools cannot expel students on the basis of their sexuality.

"A number of students reached out and were brave enough to share their stories," he said, adding that gay and lesbian children faced discrimination across the country. "A number were anonymous as they were threatened with expulsion if they talked."

Ros Philips, from Christian group FamilyVoice Australia, said Mr Greenwich's proposed change was "Orwellian" and threatened "freedom of speech, association and religion".

Dear Alex,

Back in 2007 while I was in Year 12, I was in Girlfriend magazine with a coming out story and because of that I was asked with my partner to make an appearance on Sunrise.

Because of these media appearances, students and teachers at my school found out I was gay. This didn't go down well.

It was six weeks before my HSC and they set a meeting with me and my mother to talk to them about the "issue" of my sexuality. I was called up to the office, in tears, with two teachers, the assistant principal and my mother.

We were up there for over an hour talking about what I had done, why I did it and who I was.

After this meeting the conclusion was that they would take it to the school board to see what will be done and whether or not I would be expelled. I was stressed out not knowing what would happen.

A week later I had another meeting with them which ended in the school saying I could stay in school - on these conditions:

1. I could not mention or talk about my sexuality at school to anyone.

2. My partner Rick was to have nothing to do with the school or functions.

3. I had to see a counsellor weekly until I left school.

I didn't agree with this but with only six weeks left I had to suck it up and deal with it. It left me feeling very angry and stressed.

I contemplated leaving the school and seeing the counsellor was the hardest part. Knowing who I was, and having the school make me try to "fix" myself wasn't easy. Growing up with a very supportive family, I didn't think I needed to be "fixed".

Even in our Bible Studies class I recall hearing 'if you are a homosexual you are going to hell'.

I did have two teachers who were very supportive through my situation and I thank them for that as it helped me get through my last weeks of school.

Then the school formal was another issue all together as I wanted Rick to be there. My date card was rejected because another male's name was on the card. They did not allow same sex partners to attend the formal.

It took a lot of planning to get Rick there. He ended up going as a date with one of my good friends and I took a friend of mine from outside of school.

When teachers found this out I was hounded with questions and assumptions like "he's not 30 or something is he?" Or "you won't make out with him on the dancefloor" at the actual formal?

We did sit next to each other, but we were clearly looked down upon. We did not dance together or be affectionate towards each other because it was very uncomfortable.

I thought that I had dealt with this but when the school said that they "find it offensive for people to even suggest they discriminate against students" it made me stop and think because I was discriminated against and I found it "offensive" for them to say that.

-- Adam L

Hurt ... Beci Jay was asked to leave her school. Picture: Supplied Source: NewsComAu

Dear sir/madam,

I've been gay for as long as I can remember.

I've had good male and female role models, I come from a decent family, and most people would say I am a good role model to others (now).

When I was 14, my parents and I moved to regional Queensland for a new start. In high school, I was the textbook 'gifted underachiever'. I acted out in school because I was disengaged, unchallenged and couldn't relate well to the purpose of such a 'sausage machine model' of education (one that churns out lots of copies of the same thing).

We moved to the area for a new start in my father's business and in my education. I was enrolled at a Christian school and I settled in happily in the first few months. But in Year 10 things went downhill.

I started to acknowledge and accept my own 'gay' feelings that I'd always had and experimented with another girl. It was outside of school hours, outside of school property, in the privacy of my family home.

Because I trusted one of my teachers I sat her down and told her about my feelings. But rather than help me, she told the principal ... a lie about how she'd seen me engaged in a sexual act with a girl on the bus.

I was absolutely indignant and so hurt. In the end I was asked to leave the school because after they outed me to my parents my parents supported me and not their homophobia. Apparently, our 'values' didn't align with their 'values'.

So it came to be - I ended up in public school.

The letters were first sent to Alex Greenwich, right, the independent MP for Sydney. Source: NewsComAu

After that, I tried to convert myself to heterosexuality by going to church and praying about it. Of course, nothing happened. It's like holding your breath to change your eye colour. Even if you really want it to happen, it won't. I was gay.

In such frustration and anger, I started cutting myself, binge drinking and taking risks. Later on, I started taking drugs. At the end of Year 11, I had had enough of my feelings and having to hide my true self. I thought nobody would ever accept me. Not long after that, I tried to take my own life.

My parents saw what nobody should ever have to see - their 16-year-old daughter unconscious on her bedroom floor with a pile of empty pill bottles on the shelf.

After I finished high school I moved back to Brisbane. It was much more accepting and I was free of school. Because I'd suffered so much in Years 11 and 12, I didn't bother going to uni.

After two years of working awful jobs, I finally pulled myself together and went. I am now in the final semester of my teaching program, working with a great school, getting marks within the top 15 per cent of my cohort, and blitzing life with the new-found confidence of having people around me who accept and love me.

I get treated with dignity and respect at work, university and at home. It's amazing what a difference it makes.

So why, then, should any school have the right to expel gay students? A student generally doesn't decide which school they go to and they certainly don't decide to be gay.

What a student does outside of school or in their personal life is no business of the school.

It's like expelling a student because you've heard a rumour that they are having sex out of marriage. Or if they get pregnant - imagine if someone was expelled from a school for being pregnant and told their bastard child is going to hell, as well as ten generations of their children (as it says in the Bible). Imagine the uproar then.

But because it's gay students, it's okay. Well, no it is not.

It's time for a change.

Kind regards,

-- Beci Jay

Continue the conversation on Twitter @alexgreenwich | @drpiotrowski | @newscomauHQ


21.51 | 0 komentar | Read More

Shutdown: 800,000 won't get paid

President Barack Obama took his healthcare reforms to an election, but the Tea Party Republicans have refused to pass them in the budget.

US government agencies were ordered to close for the first time in more than 17 years after Congress stalemated over Republican efforts to block President Barack Obama's health care law.

US government agencies were ordered to close for the first time in more than 17 years after Congress stalemated over Republican efforts to block President Barack Obama's health care law.

More than 800,000 federal workers were to spend Tuesday, the first day of the new fiscal year, on unpaid leave as agency managers executed contingency plans for the costly process of closing down operations indefinitely.

The official word to shut down came from the White House just before midnight Monday. Hours earlier, the Senate, by a 54-46 party-line vote, killed a House measure that would have funded government agencies for six weeks but delayed key parts of Obamacare for a year.

Shutdown: What happens now?

It was the second such vote that the Senate took during a day in which the two chambers exchanged volleys of legislation with little expectation that any of it would become law.

The one exception to the legislative futility was a bill to ensure that military service members would be paid during the shutdown. Obama signed it into law late Monday night.

The Statue of Liberty is a government facility and will be closed during the shutdown.

The House's final legislative effort passed 228-201, mostly along party lines. It would have delayed for one year the requirement in the health care law that individuals have insurance or pay a fine and would have reduced benefits for members of Congress and some of their staff members.

Late at night, Republican leaders moved to set up a House-Senate committee that could seek a compromise in coming days. Democratic leaders asserted that they would not negotiate under duress and insisted that the House first pass a measure temporarily providing funds for government agencies.

Visa panic: Will this affect your travel?

"You know, with a bully you cannot let them slap you around," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said after the Senate's initial vote. "They slap you around today, they slap you five or six times. Tomorrow it will be seven or eight times. We are not going to be bullied."

Obama warned that a shutdown would harm the nation's economy and vowed that the health care law, his signature domestic policy achievement, would move forward.

Indeed, among the ironies of the standoff is that a shutdown will have no effect on the law the Republicans tried to block. The money to implement the law does not depend on the annual spending bills stuck in the congressional logjam. A major element of Obamacare, online marketplaces that consumers without insurance can use to buy coverage, will open to the public Tuesday.

Republican House Speaker John Boehner (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

"That funding is already in place. You can't shut it down," Obama said during a short appearance earlier in the White House briefing room.

"This is a law that passed both houses of Congress, a law that bears my signature, a law that the Supreme Court upheld as constitutional, a law that voters chose not to repeal last November," he said, referring to his re-election.

"I'm always willing to work with anyone of either party to make sure the Affordable Care Act works better," he added. "But one faction of one party in one house of Congress in one branch of government doesn't get to shut down the entire government just to refight the results of an election."

Republicans, for their part, insisted that blame for the stalemate fell on Democrats. The president and his party, they said, had put preserving Obamacare ahead of keeping government agencies running.

"Americans didn't want Obamacare forced on them, and they don't want a shutdown forced on them either," Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus said in a statement. "Once again, Democrats are unwilling to listen."

Obama spoke with the four leaders of the House and Senate on Monday evening, including a 10-minute conversation with House Speaker John A. Boehner, R-Ohio, but neither side indicated progress toward a deal.

Members of the House of Representatives file into the Capitol in the dark as ideological enemies battle into the night over the US budget. Win McNamee/Getty Images/AFP

Late in the evening, after the Senate's second set of votes, Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, one of the few remaining GOP moderates, urged colleagues to compromise. "There are real lives, real families, laying awake wondering what the rest of the week is going to mean to them," she said. "It's not just about the next election."

But on both sides, many more lawmakers were looking beyond Monday's midnight deadline and focusing on which party would bear the brunt of public anger if a standoff disrupts government services.

The stalemate happened because Congress failed to pass any of the annual laws, known as appropriations, that provide money for government agencies. Federal law says agencies cannot spend money without an appropriation except when necessary to protect life or property, or in cases of programs that have permanent sources of funds.

Widespread disruption of services probably will not occur for a while. Many basic government functions do not depend on annual spending bills. Social Security cheques will go out as always, for example, as will payments under Medicare. Mail delivery will be unaffected. Courts, which have reserve funds that can last for some time, will still hear cases.

But as other government functions close, economists say, a prolonged shutdown will slow growth. A two-week standoff would shave about three-tenths of a percentage point off the current growth rate, projections indicate. Although not huge, that punch would sting in an economy expanding at less than 2 percent per year. A longer standoff would cut growth more.

The last time the government closed, during the Clinton administration, two shutdowns took place. One lasted five days; the other, affecting only part of the government, ran three weeks.

Democratic Representative from Florida Alan Grayson wears a Stars and Stripes tie as he stands outside the Senate chamber on a night of idealogical impasse. AFP PHOTO/Nicholas KAMM

Who gets the political blame for a shutdown will have a big impact on how the standoff ends.

Nearly all Democratic strategists and many Republican ones think Democrats hold the upper hand in the current fight, indicating that Republicans would eventually have to yield. Polls so far have indicated that Americans are somewhat more likely to blame congressional Republicans than Obama for the stalemate, although the advantage Democrats have is much smaller than the one they enjoyed in the Clinton-era standoff.

A Washington Post-ABC News poll released Monday showed majorities of the public disapproving of the way all the major actors in the budget drama have handled their roles, but giving congressional Republicans the worst reviews. Obama got the approval of 41 percent and the disapproval of 50 percent. Congressional Republicans got just 26 percent approval and 63 percent disapproval; congressional Democrats, 34 percent approval and 56 percent disapproval.

Some conservative Republicans argue that Obamacare's unpopularity ultimately will give them an advantage. Although polls show the health law is unpopular, the same surveys show the public does not support shutting down the government to block it.

In a CNN/ORC poll also released Monday, for example, Americans said, 60 percent to 34 percent, that it was "more important" for Congress to pass "a budget agreement that would avoid a government shutdown" than to approve legislation "preventing major provisions in the new health care law from taking effect."

As several polls have shown, Democrats remain largely united behind Obama, but significant numbers of Republicans disapprove of their party's leaders. That has proved true in Congress as well. Relatively conservative Democrats, such as Sen. Joe Manchin III of West Virginia and Mark Pryor of Arkansas, have consistently voted with Reid during the current standoff. By contrast, divisions on the Republican side have been open and bitter and continued to plague the party Monday.

US House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi strongly rejected Republican efforts to water down the healthcare bill. AFP PHOTO/Nicholas KAMM

In closed-door meetings, some of the most conservative members objected to the leadership's plans on the grounds that the latest House proposal would delay only part of Obamacare - the requirement that individuals buy health insurance - rather than the entire law.

On the other side, a group of Republicans, mostly from Northeastern and Midwestern states, said they believed the GOP should drop its efforts to block Obamacare and simply approve a measure to keep government agencies open. The group failed to round up enough support to block the Republican leadership's plans on Monday, but it could become a factor if the standoff drags on.

The party's current strategy is "a dead end," said Rep. Peter T. King, R-N.Y. "We're going to shut the government down, and, when all is said and done, we're going to get blamed for it.

"We have too many people who live in their own echo chamber."

The "Ohio Clock" outside the Senate Chamber on Capitol Hill as the midnight deadline passes and the government goes into shutdown. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)


21.51 | 0 komentar | Read More

WA prisoners cost $115,000 each

New figures show it costs $115,000 a year to keep each prisoner locked up in WA jails. Pictured is Perth's Hakea Prison. Picture: file image Source: PerthNow

IT costs $317 per day - or more than $115,000 a year - to keep each prisoner locked up in West Australian jails, new figures have revealed.

And it is even more expensive to keep a young offender behind bars.

After a horror year for the state's Department of Corrective Services (DoCS), including a riot at WA's only juvenile detention centre, it has also been revealed that the cost to keep prisoners locked up has shot up in 2012/13.

With WA's prison population topping 5000 for the first time during the period, the daily cost per inmate has risen from $291 in the previous financial year to $317.

And with some juvenile prisoners still being kept in the adult Hakea prison after the Banksia Hill riot in January, the cost to imprison a young offender was $645 a day - or more than $235,000 a year - exceeding the target cost of $558 a day.

It costs more to detain a juvenile offender than an adult one because of staffing requirements.

For every eight young detainees, there must be one guard, but the ratio is much higher for adult prisoners.

The department's annual report revealed there were 11 escapes from WA prisons in the past 12 months, but none of them were the result of malfunction or damage to the physical security of a prison, and all prisoners were returned to custody within 24 hours - two on their own accord.

There are also now 16 dangerous sex offenders in the state being tracked by controversial GPS technology, just months after it was introduced.

New laws came into effect in February to allow GPS tracking of sex offenders classified under the Dangerous Sex Offenders Act.

And the department is considering extending the use of the tracking devices to criminals convicted of arson and serious violence, which would require legislative changes.


21.51 | 0 komentar | Read More

More beds for Perth Children's Hospital

Written By Unknown on Senin, 30 September 2013 | 21.51

Perth's new children's hospital will have 24 more beds after a $35 million reconfiguration to its floor plan to add the extra room to its surgical ward.

Lighter and brighter, the Perth Children's Hospital gets a new name and an extra 24 beds under a $35 million expansion. Source: PerthNow

Lighter and brigher, the Perth Children's Hospital gets a new name and an extra 24 beds in a $35 million expansion. Source: PerthNow

PERTH'S new children's hospital will have 24 more beds after a $35 million reconfiguration to its floor plan to add the extra room to its surgical ward.

The State Government announced today it had increased beds at the facility from 274 to 298 to meet the revised demand forecast for 2021.

Premier Colin Barnett also announced that the new Nedlands hospital on the QEII site would be named Perth Children's Hospital (PCH) - the original name of the children's hospital when it opened in 1909.

The $1.2billion hospital will replace Princess Margaret Hospital in Subiaco and will serve as the hub of WA's paediatric network for the most complex and critical cases.

"The key clinical and research areas at PCH will be 52 per cent bigger than that at PMH, including an Emergency Department (ED) which will be 88 per cent bigger," Mr Barnett said.


The Family Resource Centre will be more than three times the size of that in PMH, and three out of four rooms will be single rooms.

"PCH is the centrepiece of the WA child health care system.  As a world-class tertiary hospital, it will provide the specialty medical treatment required for the most serious medical cases," Mr Barnett said.

Health Minister Kim Hames said the expanded capacity at PCH was part of the Government's program to boost the total number of paediatric beds across the metropolitan area to about 400.

"PCH will be supported by six other public hospitals - Fiona Stanley Hospital, Midland Public Hospital, Joondalup Health Campus, Peel Health Campus, Armadale-Kelmscott Memorial Hospital and Rockingham General Hospital - all with dedicated paediatric beds," Dr Hames said.
 


21.51 | 0 komentar | Read More

Boat arrives with 80 ‘asylum seekers’

The PM insists his talks with Indonesia's leader will cover more than asylum seekers as he heads to Jakarta.

The new vessel came hours before Immigration Minister Scott Morrison was due to hold his weekly briefing on boat arrivals this afternoon. Source: News Limited

A BOAT carrying up to 80 suspected asylum seekers has arrived at Christmas Island this morning.

The vessel was escorted to the island by the Navy after calling in to WA authorities.

Passengers were transferred to immigration detention on the island but the government is yet to reveal the latest arrival under its new secrecy provisions.

ABBOTT FLIES OUT AMID CONTROVERSY

The new vessel came hours before Immigration Minister Scott Morrison was due to hold his weekly briefing on boat arrivals this afternoon.

He was expected to be challenged on the secrecy surrounding boat arrivals and rescues after the gagging of search and rescue agencies restricted access to information about the latest sinking on Friday night which claimed dozens of lives.

The government has gagged all agencies which previously provided details on asylum boat issues and has decided to hold weekly briefings.

###


21.51 | 0 komentar | Read More
techieblogger.com Techie Blogger Techie Blogger